You’ll hear occasional complaints from some baristas that they’re unforgiving. The exit surface area was often smaller than the entrance, resulting in a poor flow of water.Īnd so, for several years, the VST baskets reigned supreme. What’s more, the geometry of these baskets usually wasn’t optimised for an even extraction. Some were big enough to allow particles to pass through, while others so small that they were blocked. Prior to this, most baskets had serious design flaws. It then offered a filter with guaranteed consistency of hole placement and shape. However, VST investigated the effects of geometry, hole diameter, and shape on extraction. Synesso baskets were always highly regarded. While VST were revolutionary, they weren’t the first to offer superior baskets to what arrived with an espresso machine. SEE ALSO: Espresso Machine Mods: 4 Reasons to Use a Naked Portafilter So how do IMS rank against VST? I decided to put them both to the test in a blind tasting with a range of basket sizes. Yet over the past several years, attitudes towards espresso baskets have been changing.Īnd today, we have a new challenger brand in town: IMS. This was years after other equipment advances were made. It was little more than half a decade ago that Vince Fedele of VST first unleashed his baskets on the world. And so, despite their critical impact on extraction, they’re often overlooked.
Espresso baskets: they’re small but mighty.
0 kommentar(er)
